Because I.m a religious person people is interesting in knowing what do I think about hot topics where moral is involve. It’s seems that always moral is involve when you have religious believes but in reality moral is involve always if you are a human being, it doesn’t matter if you believe in something else that is not being focus in your own existence, in this case, your world would end when you die.
Nowadays one of the most popular matters is the contend between people who support “pro-life” versus the supporters of “pro-choice”. I still surprised that women let this happens. I just gave this topic a lot of thought and still I come up with new approaches.
First of all, I don’t like the use of the terms of neither of them because it’s very simplistic, to enclose the complexity of this in two words.
Let’s start with pro-life, who is against life? Few people really mean it and those probably had killed themselves or try too if they were serious about it. “Pro-life” isn’t a counter position to “Pro-choice”. In spite what that term was chose for, to express the rejection of abortion, the term is so general that may include anything. Probably the most of us are pro-life, including the “pro-choice” followers. If we don’t smoke, and we don’t drink much or if we don’t do drugs or anything that put us in danger or do crazy risky things, we will be pro-lifeses.
My point is that it shouldn’t exist this term at all but let the pro-choicers define themselves, thought be a “pro-choice”is a total fallacy too, and here it’s where the political thing intervene.
First, women had always the choice to do an abortion, this is not about the choice, what really is about if who will pay for the surgery. In socialist countries, the governments with the people money pay for this, but this have sense for them because is cheaper to pay for an abortion, to ride off the baby that to pay for his or her education and health, so in economic terms that is the perfect solution.
Women had aborted since the world is world with different methods and for different reasons maybe it wasn’t made in the open, it wasn’t something that people needed to know and it wasn’t something that women did happily at less the most of them. Until no long ago to hide the fact that this kind of event had happened in the life of a woman it was a must.
There’s a lot of controversy about when life starts, but to me life starts when it starts, from the beginning, I don’t have doubt about it. This kind of discussion only serves to the purpose of explain if “to kill” is more justifiable in a one month pregnancy or later.
Second is the moral issue. This will be of a relative weight depending of the person and the circumstances and the circumstances of the surroundings, the believes of the society where that person lives and the options she has. Example of this is China where women are forced to abort (they have an option but the extra children will be out of the system).
Thou should not kill, one of the ten commandments, our society would be a different society if we respect the 10 commandments. This set of rules that are very practical in any way you see it, yes, these laws are universal and are common sense rules but humans have to complicate it all. Life would be so much easy, but sometimes to kill is justifiable when we don’t have more options or we think we don’t have.
Third, “pro-choice”instead to help women to enhance themselves and have a better life, reduce them to be in an awkward position. I wonder who is behind this, probably it was a man who had the brilliant idea of feed women with the idea that they were owners of their own bodies. I read that in the beginning this was a narrow solution for women who were forced to have children by her husband against their will. Somebody took this idea to the extreme becoming a political issue that come up in every election. Are you pro-life or pro-choice? My answer would be, neither.
Meanwhile, we have women who believe intensely in their rights to ride off any life that they could create only because of the fact that their bodies are their property, and it’s partially true because our bodies belongs to us until we get pregnant. At that point, our bodies became hostess but with the aggravation that if women discharge the host, the host inevitable die. A baby it isn’t a roommate or a renter, a visit or an stranger. We have the choice, but before. We have the choice to be responsible with our bodies, what I’d call the pre-choice.
Nowadays where women have so many options, cheap and expensive to take care of themselves, with so much information and help, more generational communication about tabu topics like sex , with so less prejudices alike past generations and organization that give children in adoption when a mother can’t take care of her offspring. Yes, abortion should belong to the past with the exception of health issues. Like always, exceptions confirm the rule.
Fourth, I wonder what happens with the rights of the men? because until I know we need two to conceive a human being.
This “pro-choice”thing is so convenient for some men and I don’t want to put all the men in the same sack because I know men who fight for the right to keep the baby in court and they lost the case because it looks that women have 100 % of the decision leaving the father of the child outside completely. It isn’t fair at all. It should be fifty-fifty.
Men should be responsible too about a pregnancy, they shouldn’t be left behind, they are not the ones who undergo the procedure so I may understand that they can take this lightly but I cannot understand that women take this lightly. I think that is a matter of education and conscientiousness (aware). A man who has sex with a woman should considerate the possibility of a pregnancy. If a man never would chose this woman to be the mother of his children, probably shouldn’t have intercourse with her in the first place. It doesn’t matter all the things available to avoid pregnancy, those things should help us to have a better life (plan when is the best moment to have a child or at least when we think it is and chose how many kids do we want)) but it shouldn’t mean that we have to became promiscuous or behave in ways that don’t make us better persons or than worn us. Probably the most fulfill life is to live in family or/and community.
I have an answer also for people who believe that plan your family is a sin because you are standing in the God’s way by not let God make his job (like”I will have all the children God send me because that is the will of God). There is not a human power who can stand between God and the rest of the things, if really God is interesting in you to have X amount of children (I don’t think he is) no contraceptive pill or method would overcome God will.
There are so many more aspects to this discussion but now I’m tired and I want to go to bed…and still I have to put the dishes in the machine.
Good Night!!